From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jan 10 8:10:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211F637B69E for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 08:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0AGA2a96311; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 08:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 08:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101101610.f0AGA2a96311@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Josef Karthauser Subject: Re: misc/24226: PicoBSD do not build on 5.0-current Reply-To: Josef Karthauser Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/24226; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Josef Karthauser To: "Alex D. Chen" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/24226: PicoBSD do not build on 5.0-current Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:03:47 +0000 On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:00:36PM +0000, Alex D. Chen wrote: > > >Description: > PicoBSD does not build on 5.0-current.It will stop at building tinyware/sps. > After tracing the source code, I found that sps refers to a structure > "eproc", but it seems that there is no definition about this structure. > The sps programme needs updating to take on-board the recent changes That Kirk make to ps. I've had a look at it, but don't really understand how it ticks yet. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message