Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:25:10 +0200
From:      Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre <egoitz@ramattack.net>
To:        Jay West <jwest@ezwind.net>
Cc:        "<freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts
Message-ID:  <F1A41A49-E77B-4F7E-B5E7-D2648438758E@ramattack.net>
In-Reply-To: <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net>
References:  <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <C29A4285-989C-4F3F-BE5D-B92959E0BD92@ramattack.net> <op.wit1wntv34t2sn@me-pc> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> <op.wixrbfzh34t2sn@localhost> <D530A3A1-A370-47E7-B4A5-041B39DDB677@ramattack.net> <op.wi1acbvj34t2sn@tech304> <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


El 14/08/2012, a las 16:10, "Jay West" <jwest@ezwind.net> escribi=C3=B3:

> Mark Felder wrote...
> ----------------------
> The xen-tools {port} should include this work. It has nothing to do with w=
hat dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't enable i=
t in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port if necessar=
y. There's just no sound reason why this should be a completely separate por=
t.
> ______________
>=20
> Wholeheartedly agree.
>=20
> Jay West, President
> Open Source Associates, LLC
> PO Box 460454
> Saint Louis, MO 63146
> Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000
> Toll Free: (866) 343-2589
> Fax: (314) 558-


Hi,

It depend's if the dom0 uses xapi or not for being managed... And this scrip=
ts mainly maintain xenstore database for info to be exchanged with XenCenter=
 a citrix managing product, this is the main reason because I assume that ba=
re xen-tools shouldn't include XenServerTools's xenstore management scripts f=
or xenstore to be useful with XenCenter. Perhaps using an option for includi=
ng them or not in the port could be valid too... But I assume the mere fact o=
f using Xentools should not really assume we're going to usr Citrix products=
... This is my opinion.

Best Regards,




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F1A41A49-E77B-4F7E-B5E7-D2648438758E>