Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:40:36 -0500 From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: fbsd@dannysplace.net Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. Message-ID: <5f67a8c40901072340u1dd514b4x21506d4ca491ff6d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <496549D9.7010003@dannysplace.net> References: <20081031033208.GA21220@icarus.home.lan> <490A8FAD.8060009@dannysplace.net> <491BBF38.9010908@dannysplace.net> <491C5AA7.1030004@samsco.org> <491C9535.3030504@dannysplace.net> <CEDCDD3E-B908-44BF-9D00-7B73B3C15878@anduin.net> <4920E1DD.7000101@dannysplace.net> <F55CD13C-8117-4D34-9C35-618D28F9F2DE@spry.com> <20081117070818.GA22231@icarus.home.lan> <496549D9.7010003@dannysplace.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Danny Carroll <fbsd@dannysplace.net> wrote: > I'd like to post some results of what I have found with my tests. > I did a few different types of tests. Basically a set of 5-disk tests > and a set of 12-disk tests. > > I did this because I only had 5 ports available on my onboard controller > and I wanted to see how the areca compared to that. I also wanted to > see comparisons between JBOD, Passthru and hardware raid5. > > I have not tested raid6 or raidz2. > > You can see the results here: > http://www.dannysplace.net/quickweb/filesystem%20tests.htm > ... been a long time since I've seen someone link stuff on this list that won't shot in Firefox. Pretty sad that it's just a table of values that would be just as well presented as text.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5f67a8c40901072340u1dd514b4x21506d4ca491ff6d>