Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:13:26 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org, virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0 Message-ID: <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org> References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I'd like anyone possible to test an updated version of > emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11}. I have the patch here for those who > wish to build themselves: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~swills/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools-10.1.0.diff I tried to built it on 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r307013:311651M (why does it say r307013:311651M, btw?) and it failed to build with: utilBacktrace.c:155:20: error: implicit declaration of function '_Unwind_GetCFA' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] uintptr_t cfa = _Unwind_GetCFA(ctx); ^ utilBacktrace.c:357:4: error: implicit declaration of function '_Unwind_Backtrace' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] _Unwind_Backtrace(UtilBacktraceFromPointerCallback, &data); ^ utilBacktrace.c:357:4: note: did you mean 'Util_Backtrace'? Any ideas ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170121141326.GK13006>