From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Nov 18 16:41:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA12342 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:41:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12335 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:41:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca13-199.ix.netcom.com [209.109.238.199]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA11346 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id QAA04931; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199811190040.QAA04931@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199811182341.XAA17660@jhs.muc.de> Subject: Re: Is a Satan port available ? From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > This is patently untrue. Anyone who doubts it is welcome to search > the mail archives. Moreover, this person (jhs) asked almost the exact same question two years ago. This was my reply at that time. === The satan port was uploaded to wcarchive's incoming and had disappeared before the porter sent mail asking "why didn't my port get in?" a few weeks later. I never heard back from the porter since. As far as I know, there has never been any philosophical discussion about whether the port is suitable or not. At least not in -ports (I don't read all the lists), which is the only place to have an "official" discussion of that sort. === I have no interest in what axe he has to grind but it's obvious he has one against me. It's such a waste of time to deal with him. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message