From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue May 14 02:13:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA22109
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 14 May 1996 02:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aic.net (AIC.NET [194.67.30.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA22081;
          Tue, 14 May 1996 02:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: edd@aic.net
Received: by aic.net (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA03572; Tue, 14 May 1996 13:05:49 +0400 (AMST)
Message-Id: <199605140905.NAA03572@aic.net>
Subject: Re: UNIX System
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 13:05:48 +0400 (AMST)
Cc: edd@aic.net, chat@freebsd.org, rnordier@iafrica.com, questions@freebsd.org,
        chat@allegro.lemis.de
In-Reply-To: <199605132226.PAA10749@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at May 13, 96 03:26:26 pm
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> > > >> still wondering, however, whether it may not be called "Berkeley
> > > >> UNIX".
> > 
> > I think there are no such thing as "Berkeley UNIX". If you refer to
> > BSD, you have to write BSD (and indicate release), 
> > not UNIX. Because "UNIX" originally referred
> > to System V, again, IMHO.
> 
> The term "Berkeley UNIX" was used in the origina daemon book, and
> AT&T/USL did not object to that usage.

ok. At least in CSRG documentation it's called BSD :)


-edd