From owner-cvs-all Tue Oct 3 9:40:30 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from cheddar.netmonger.net (cheddar.netmonger.net [209.54.21.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3742A37B670; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from chris@localhost) by cheddar.netmonger.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA05685; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:40:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20001003124008.A4892@netmonger.net> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:40:08 -0400 From: Christopher Masto To: Warner Losh , Paul Richards Cc: Kris Kennaway , Joseph Scott , Brian Somers , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/finger finger.c Mail-Followup-To: Warner Losh , Paul Richards , Kris Kennaway , Joseph Scott , Brian Somers , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <39D98B55.126DAFC4@originative.co.uk> <200010022227.PAA62603@freefall.freebsd.org> <39D92E08.E00CF2E4@owp.csus.edu> <20001002180303.A40584@freefall.freebsd.org> <39D98B55.126DAFC4@originative.co.uk> <200010031530.JAA26493@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <200010031530.JAA26493@harmony.village.org>; from Warner Losh on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 09:30:13AM -0600 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 09:30:13AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > : I think we push too many enhancements from current to stable, when we > : should really only push bug fixes onto the stable branch. The tendency > : to add enhancements carries the risk of actually creating new bugs in > : stable which is obviously not what we want to have happen. > > Exactly. We shouldn't be merging features at all, unless there's a > compelling reason, the code has been reviewed by at least two people > and it has had at least a month or two in current. If you can't find > two people to review the code, then you can't merge it to stable due > to lack of interest. The problem with being too cautious is that stable becomes unusable and people who shouldn't be running current start moving to it because stable doesn't support their new laptop. I think it's important to push _some_ features into stable. Having to wait several years for the next major "point-oh" release of FreeBSD (which comes with "point-oh fear" holding it back) is not the best way to do things. IMO. There's a place between these two extremes of paranoia and wild abandon, and I think that's where the MFCs should take place. -- Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications chris@netmonger.net info@netmonger.net http://www.netmonger.net Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon -- http://www.freebsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message