Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 23:16:47 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> To: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pkg_version perl hacker project Message-ID: <20010424231647.B592@iv.nn.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20010424125858.M19530@rand.tgd.net>; from sean@chittenden.org on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:58:58PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104230806060.27435-100000@wildside.wagsky.com> <20010423231827.A19530@rand.tgd.net> <20010424142340.E5216@brel.com> <20010424014833.B19530@rand.tgd.net> <20010424120052.H89156@xor.obsecurity.org> <200104241907.f3OJ7u103414@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010424125858.M19530@rand.tgd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Sean Chittenden! Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:58:58, sean (Sean Chittenden) wrote about "Re: pkg_version perl hacker project": > With this comment, I'm lead to believe that there is no > central place where ports that have been marked as FORBIDDEN resides. > Fact or fiction? Would anyone object to a new ports top level > directory called one of the following (or any combination thereof): > > /usr/ports/Security > /usr/ports/Pkg-advisories > /usr/ports/Misc/Security/ports-advisories It shall cause repository bloating. CVS cannot deal with moving directories. > Something with an uppercase that should stay out of the way of > normal. It is too old unix style ;| /netch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010424231647.B592>