From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 16 16:50:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10D179B for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 16:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A953E1A38 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 16:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oica37 with SMTP id a37so103341226oic.0 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/LwpxjTaPKcdpBfIKsiHS/rX0KcN8aCscYqKNS3f5F4=; b=T0Ul/gHvwTDJG2A5ioIgago5v7OUtoFriZ/9NM6ZpDRCTr6mweTa+xlsFvV+VBsdLA 14Svzr2BUh4v1vJhbLCC38pVLUoRApHLzo66rOWr0+x20CoirBhlu1vwri3eQOEQFjHK ItmKVA/pGHsJbmEHqPBR/mfC0pjKgMzxg3rf7oFLBsyrWeBWbQFAenK+ifhHIRayXlQC JhXy7lVBEgqbbJCDNdB4hcQkg8Uz3kKIqwfEb8Tr1ix5SEv6F/iDQbDsGUrzHWA4NYaF u6CCLlC6mHB/1OHMpLlzX0TWmBj7bAsXvxv/oM2AYwB2Tk9ChPWSQOolNO3fdlI+5V4m xGNw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7+JodLv5Us3tytMAIZ4Bnwg+M7pYpHc+8TEcoFkPCBAy121XfbMWPxZqCMeBj0nOOhAAw X-Received: by 10.60.147.194 with SMTP id tm2mr13262062oeb.75.1431795034319; Sat, 16 May 2015 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sunpoet@sunpoet.net Received: by 10.202.174.4 with HTTP; Sat, 16 May 2015 09:50:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9D82E14D-299F-4377-9D48-912097AD1DC3@adamw.org> References: <201505151805.t4FI5Gll087580@svn.freebsd.org> <555770FA.60105@FreeBSD.org> <9D82E14D-299F-4377-9D48-912097AD1DC3@adamw.org> From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 00:50:13 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: m0RfKLPeWJWZdvS6rasYwgVgtoU Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r386459 - head/www/npm To: Adam Weinberger Cc: Bryan Drewery , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 16:50:42 -0000 On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 16 May, 2015, at 10:31, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > > On 5/16/2015 11:26 AM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Adam Weinberger >> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 15 May, 2015, at 12:05, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh > wrote: > >>> > >>> Author: sunpoet > >>> Date: Fri May 15 18:05:15 2015 > >>> New Revision: 386459 > >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/386459 > >>> > >>> Log: > >>> - Add ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=amd64 > >> > >> Woah. Are you sure that npm won't run on i386? It worked on my i386 > >> box yesterday, what changed? > >> > >> # Adam > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Adam Weinberger > >> adamw@adamw.org > >> http://www.adamw.org > >> > >> > >> I don't know. I keep receiving pkg-fallout mails about *-i386 builds. > > > > This task is currently in my court. It's a compatibility regression on > > head. I volunteered to fix it. > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178881 > > > > There's a proposed temporary patch for npm in > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198350. I'm not sure > > the scope of the impact of the npm patch though. > > So it's more that it's BROKEN on 32-bit 8 and 9 than ONLY_FOR_ARCHS amd64. > > Sunpoet, whatever makes most sense for you, I'd just like to request that > the build be restored on 32-bit 10.x because it works fine there. > > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adamw@adamw.org > http://www.adamw.org > > > Thanks for these information. I didn't notice that PRs (178881 and 198350). I'm going to revert r386459 and apply patch from PR/198350. I'm waiting for poudriere build. :) Regads, sunpoet