Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Jul 2000 12:59:56 -0500
From:      Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        wilko@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>
Subject:   Re: /sys hierarchy
Message-ID:  <20000702125956.C66762@holly.calldei.com>
In-Reply-To: <200007021744.KAA34748@john.baldwin.cx>
References:  <20000702114353.C19714@freebie.wbnet> <200007021744.KAA34748@john.baldwin.cx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, July 02, 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
> Sounds good to me actually.  Although, should it be ${MACHINE_ARCH}/compile
> instead in keeping with the mentioned goal of keeping all MD stuff under
> ${MACHINE_ARCH}?

   I think that compile/${MACHINE_ARCH} is the proper way to do
this.  Everything else is source only, all the object files end
up inside compile/ so there's only one place to clean up.

-- 
|Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
|My reality check just bounced. 
`----------------------------------


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000702125956.C66762>