From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 3 15:09:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BEA106564A for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@freebsd.org) Received: from nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 335CA8FC15 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [72.30.22.78] by nm16.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jul 2012 15:09:36 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.3] by tm12.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jul 2012 15:09:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jul 2012 15:09:36 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 548537.32269.bm@omp1003.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 91984 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jul 2012 15:09:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1341328176; bh=2/9bjUDRn/4G8ZEAd1Ay0G0zi5PcMvgKo8lJyv54Lnk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=T/kPXO/uV5r2JiepoXrrWbi3YDErOz+ptUzyuscVdB/d7ZEsv9jF5/LIy5EdkobQlhgyaBgxcfS6ibf0FuMLus8UmvzVeEkXTHPFRj875JxVu01zw4Uk2Y0SdmbSSjxXt2u4HhjaqGor9th8yLlVV9hbU8ri8ZVAzjW3c6d62dk= X-YMail-OSG: wr2WtuYVM1kLmwxhxMF7K2p22N39jxH6LpWL0qsUqkbAwEt CtGwUGf3xkQ50gA3Z2Roe.UbcQkdOStkmNMQ0HhffPCMPgziDlP4UUTfn0.U 72QojLpF93KsNsCxTB59odWuNDPwRmP7GkoO3y8yVMOQDW.p5ieNyw51tpvW fZ6Tad9slC62ozpIEu1SBR_QQGrb9CTBlhzE5xLSAvBOlzU5mLrvHpcpHOVA 9mvlbhg.49IChMyGATzvknvK4PEiiqn5qpdYATgAlY1pOB.kXvkR9dtEiVlJ jNQnfJ5YbD4FkcYxLqqjwpBO9VY04mhj5JvBIIOC_OCf.CULAND7694p4TOo olTSyPADfdOsyv314PT8PhR8uQeecp1af3wG.fNXaNx9baqoW4yT3WEF_3qU s5XvC8zeN5SUiKYFhWzXQGOYNrVeH1ok8okuKt8dZ3tznaYDg.Hp.FsTwF.R vrsPt Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:09:35 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524 Message-ID: <1341328175.90641.YahooMailClassic@web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:09:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Giffuni To: David O'Brien , gnn@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <86mx3gdhlk.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Doug Barton Subject: Re: svn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c... X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfg@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:09:42 -0000 =0A=0A--- Mar 3/7/12, gnn@freebsd.org ha scritto:=0A...= =0A> Again, moving to arch@=0A> =0A> At Mon, 2 Jul 2012 14:09:31 -0700,=0A>= David O'Brien wrote:=0A> > =0A> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0700= , Doug Barton=0A> wrote:=0A> > > On 06/29/2012 10:58, Pedro Giffuni wrote:= =0A> > > > Now .. David pointed out I am not respecting the code=0A> > > > = provenance since I didn't add them to the opensolaris=0A> > > > vendor area= , but these files are copyrighted Joyent=0A> > > > Inc (not even Illumos) s= o I cannot put them there=0A> > > > unless we create a new vendor for Joyen= t=0A> > > =0A> > > Creating a new vendor area would be the right solution, = yes.=0A> > =0A> > I totally disagree -- it will cause a real pain merging.= =0A> > =0A=0AThe idea was to keep in order the code provenance issue.=0AIll= umos is not a vendor: the changes are copyrighted=0Aindividually by Nexenta= , Joyent, Delphix and others=0Aand if we want to track IP property for what= ever reason=0Ait's convenient to have it separate from the OpenSolaris=0Ast= uff.=0A=0AConcerning the multiple vendor issue if time proves that=0Aopenso= laris is dead then we don't have a problem and we=0Acan just drop that bran= ch. I suspect that if OpenSolaris=0Asomehow resurrects Illumos will have to= deal with it too.=0A(so yes, I guess I am starting to agree with David).= =0A=0A> > Think about it -- if we import a new code drop of=0A> > uts/commo= n/fs/zfs/*.c into=0A> > '^/vendor-sys/illumos', how do we merge that to HEA= D?=0A> > =0A> > I don't believe 'svn merge -c ' will work=0A> > becaus= e we already have a=0A> > different uts/common/fs/zfs/*.c from ^/vendor-sys= /opensolaris.=0A> > =0A> > I think we either need to just call Illumos Open= Solaris for these=0A> > purposes, or 'svn move opensolaris illumos'.=0A> > = =0A> > I think this needs to be discussed with the Repo Meisters.=0A> =0A> = I actually agree with Doug here, but not strongly, I'd prefer to be=0A> bet= ter educated about this topic.=A0 Do our Repo Meisters=0A> read arch@?=0A> = =0A=0ADoing a copy we preserve the opensolaris branch information,=0Adoing = a rename we can always branch a new opensolaris again=0Afrom a specific rev= ision if we want to.=0A=0AFWIW, I think it's actually the same to do a copy= or a rename,=0Abut I guess I can be re-educated too.=0A=0AThe "svn copy" w= as already done though so I wonder if=0Areworking it is really necessary.= =0A=0APedro.