Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:05:12 -0300 From: Alexandre =?utf-8?Q?C=2E_Guimar=C3=A3es?= <lebarondemerde@privacychain.ch> To: "Igor V. Ruzanov" <igorr@pochta-mx.canmos.ru>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solaris Doors IPC Implementation Message-ID: <20180914170512.tymsk4mzqusxylya@privacychain.ch> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1809141158270.36483@pochta.canmos.ru> References: <20180913210646.vgbaoyornms6xplc@privacychain.ch> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1809141158270.36483@pochta.canmos.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:02:37PM +0300, Igor V. Ruzanov wrote: > On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Alexandre C. Guimarães wrote: > > |Hi. > | > |Reading the FreeBSD IdeasPage I see the desire to have the 'Solaris Doors IPC' > |implemented on FreeBSD. > | > |Due to curiosity, what are the advantages of the Solaris IPC over Mach? I mean > |Mach was already implement in NextBSD. > > These are different implementations. Mach ports use asynchronous > communication model while the Solaris DOORS are being synchronous. There > are different applications for these IPC models That made it very clear, and I actually found some more info about asynchronous/synchronous IPCs on a old ChorusOS doc. https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19048-01/chorus5/806-6897/architecture-109/index.html Thanks! > > > |Thanks. > | > |-- > |Best regards./lebarondemerde > |_______________________________________________ > |freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > |https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > |To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > | -- Best regards./lebarondemerde
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180914170512.tymsk4mzqusxylya>