Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:05:12 -0300
From:      Alexandre =?utf-8?Q?C=2E_Guimar=C3=A3es?= <lebarondemerde@privacychain.ch>
To:        "Igor V. Ruzanov" <igorr@pochta-mx.canmos.ru>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Solaris Doors IPC Implementation
Message-ID:  <20180914170512.tymsk4mzqusxylya@privacychain.ch>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1809141158270.36483@pochta.canmos.ru>
References:  <20180913210646.vgbaoyornms6xplc@privacychain.ch> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1809141158270.36483@pochta.canmos.ru>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:02:37PM +0300, Igor V. Ruzanov wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Alexandre C. GuimarĂ£es wrote:
> 
> |Hi.
> |
> |Reading the FreeBSD IdeasPage I see the desire to have the 'Solaris Doors IPC'
> |implemented on FreeBSD.
> |
> |Due to curiosity, what are the advantages of the Solaris IPC over Mach? I mean
> |Mach was already implement in NextBSD.
> 
> These are different implementations. Mach ports use asynchronous 
> communication model while the Solaris DOORS are being synchronous. There 
> are different applications for these IPC models 

That made it very clear, and I actually found some more info about
asynchronous/synchronous IPCs on a old ChorusOS doc.

https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19048-01/chorus5/806-6897/architecture-109/index.html

Thanks!

> 
> 
> |Thanks.
> |
> |-- 
> |Best regards./lebarondemerde
> |_______________________________________________
> |freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> |https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> |To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> |


-- 
Best regards./lebarondemerde



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180914170512.tymsk4mzqusxylya>