From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 26 15:39:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFA8106566B; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netch@segfault.kiev.ua) Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (segfault.kiev.ua [193.193.193.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC83C8FC1B; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (localhost.segfault.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.kiev.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.Who.Cares) with ESMTP id o5QFd5n3012120; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:39:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch@segfault.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by segfault.kiev.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o5QFcxjw012116; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:38:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:38:59 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev To: Michael Tuexen Message-ID: <20100626153859.GB1502@netch.kiev.ua> References: <20100626130013.GA1502@netch.kiev.ua> <9B01BACA-B0A6-4D89-8BE4-437002D7CE8E@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9B01BACA-B0A6-4D89-8BE4-437002D7CE8E@freebsd.org> X-42: On Cc: rrs@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCTP panic with sctp_send() X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: netch@netch.kiev.ua List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:39:12 -0000 Hi, Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 17:11:13, tuexen wrote about "Re: SCTP panic with sctp_send()": > > As seen from code, if uap->tolen is zero, `to' isn't initialized and remains > > NULL. This error is identical to -CURRENT. > How can the crash be reproduced? Any code with sctp_send() under ktrace. > Can you provide a small test program? http://segfault.kiev.ua/~netch/20100626.2/ sps.c - server, spc.c - client run server in one terminal and client under ktrace in another one. > > why after `to'? shall be written as "why 0 after `to'?" -netch-