Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:53:17 +0100
From: (tk)
Subject:   Re: Partition naming, fstab, and geli
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:01:26 -0500, Jerry McAllister <> wrote:

> > As for 'd' vs 'e', sometime a long time and many generations ago there
> > was a convention of reserving 'd' for something.  I don't remember what
> > it was.  It was pre FreeBSD 3 and pre 1997 and maybe even pre any FreeBSD
> > and applied in some earlier Unix-en before the court cases, but not after.
> > That old convention accounts for documentation starting with using 'e' for 
> > extra partitions and skipping 'd'.   But, whatever that old convention
> > was, it has not been used for so long that it is meaningless nowdays
> > and 'd' can be used for whatever extra partition you want.
> You say it: I KNEW that there was something someone had
> on his mind when reserving 'd' for something special...
> but WHAT it exactly was, I don't know.

If I remember correctly, NetBSD still uses (or did so until a few years
ago) the 'd' partition to represent the whole disk, while 'c' is used in
the usual way to represent the whole slice.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>