Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 18:01:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com>, Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG>, FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/sys random.h src/sys/dev/randomdev hash.c hash.h harvest.c randomdev.c yarrow.c yarro Message-ID: <200009120101.e8C11nN56928@realtime.exit.com> In-Reply-To: <20000912091705.O19431@wantadilla.lemis.com> from Greg Lehey at "Sep 12, 2000 09:17:05 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey wrote: > I've been wondering whether we shouldn't associate mutexes with data > structures rather than code. It's possible that it would make it > easier to avoid deadlocks. Thoughts? Speaking as a BSD/OS (and former Unixware) developer: YES! :-) -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://store.exit.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009120101.e8C11nN56928>