From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 16 21: 2:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BF5A10EBD for ; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 21:02:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 10Cz7z-0006Rk-00; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:02:27 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.2/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA51329; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:05:06 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199902170505.WAA51329@harmony.village.org> To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: runsocks (Was Re: gpib driver - does anybody use it?) Cc: Andre Albsmeier , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Feb 1999 17:01:00 +1030." References: Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:05:05 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Kris Kennaway writes: : runsocks works fine for me in socksifying the stuff I use it for : (FTP clients, simple TCP apps, etc). What are you having problems : with? I have verified that runsocks works with both a.out and elf binaries (but not both at the same time) with the most current port. It does not work for statically linked binaries. Anything outside of that are that isn't pilot error is a bug that I'd be interested in... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message