Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:03:59 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes Message-ID: <400D6D8F.7010708@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040120175136.GC3365@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <1074617147.757.16.camel@gyros> <20040120171315.GH94636@FreeBSD.org> <1074619795.757.43.camel@gyros> <400D68A1.4030501@fillmore-labs.com> <1074620919.757.51.camel@gyros> <20040120175136.GC3365@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>>(01.20.2004 @ 1248 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 3.9K: <<
>>>Can we at least have
>>>
>>>OPTIONSNAME?=${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME}
>>>
>>>here? It makes sense for all the localized ports, perl, ruby, python, linux
>>>and others.
>>
>>That makes sense...maybe having the whole trifecta is a good idea, too:
>>${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME}${PKGNAMESUFFIX}
>>
>>And what about UNIQUENAME instead of OPTIONSNAME? This way, it could be
>>used for other purposes.
>>
>>>end of "Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes" from Joe Marcus Clarke <<
>
>
> If all you're going for is a unique identifier for each port, this is
> guaranteed unique:
>
> ${.CURDIR:S@${PORTSDIR}@@:S@/@_@g}
>
> x11_gnome2, etc.
Sorry to bring it up again, LATEST_LINK is designed to do what we want, it
has just a stupid name...
Look at
<http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-packages-5-latest/Latest/>;
all packages in one directory, no collisions, version independend. It even
survives renaming / category changes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?400D6D8F.7010708>