From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 26 6:58:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CD115007 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 06:58:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11404; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 09:58:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 09:58:02 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Tom Cc: "Chad R. Larson" , Igor Roshchin , dkelly@hiwaay.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD [3.1] is Unix ??? (Was: Re: 3.1 Release splash image) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Tom wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Chad R. Larson wrote: > > > Any idea what would be involved in getting to be "Real UNIX"? I > > mean, besides the obvious license fee to X/Open. > > > > Is there some validation suite that would have to be passed? How > > close are we? > > It will never happen. I don't the validation suite is freely available, > and it costs a lot of money for an official test. So the best you can do > is eyeball the spec and eyeball the code and figure it out for yourself. Not only does the validation process cost money, but passing requires Motif/CDE. (For the workstation Unix at least). -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message