From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 21 20:08:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD5C37B401; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 20:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56E743FCB; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 20:08:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5M38LKJ037715; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:08:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)h5M38LfN037712; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:08:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:08:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "Matthew N. Dodd" In-Reply-To: <20030620180948.F76384@sasami.jurai.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Norikatsu Shigemura cc: Joe Kelsey Subject: Re: /etc/libmap.conf MFC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 03:08:34 -0000 On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > ... > > > "editing of shared libraries" problem I posted about earlier. It also > > > does not seem like a real big deal to do an MFC for. > > > > That's good idea. I want this feature, too. > > You should upgrade to 5.1 if it has features that you want. > > Adding new features to the STABLE branch this late in its lifetime seems > pointless. 4.x will likely live on both in development and production for quite a long time, and will therefore likely see MFC's of much larger things than libmap.conf support. That said, if you're not willing to backport/maintain it in 4.x, I agree that it will need to find an owner in order to make it to 4.x :-). Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories