From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 26 11:06:25 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA22155 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 11:06:25 -0800 Received: from post.demon.co.uk (post.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.72]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA22149 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 11:06:22 -0800 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa07581; 26 Mar 95 19:39 GMT-60:00 Received: from localhost (gary@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA00187 ; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 19:15:42 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , FreeBSD Ports Subject: 2.1 ports testing (was Re: expect & majordomo requests (fwd)) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Mar 1995 12:01:16 PST." <18247.796075276@freefall.cdrom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <183.796241741.1@palmer.demon.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 19:15:41 +0100 Message-ID: <184.796241741@palmer.demon.co.uk> From: Gary Palmer Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <18247.796075276@freefall.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >I have no objections if you want to be that detailed about it. Sure! I dunno if we can formulate a (workable) system for alpha'ing ports, but the tree should be tagged & branched at least... Anyone have any ideas how we could test the majority of ports on the branch without someone (i.e. one person) going through the tree one port at a time? Gary