From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 11 08:44:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EFA9977A4 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7902813DB for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C99AC3F82F; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 04:43:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A0D749.9090603@sneakertech.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 04:43:53 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon CC: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Questions about freebsd-update References: <559C6B73.8050509@sneakertech.com> <559EA8B8.8080701@sneakertech.com> <559ED47E.8050905@hiwaay.net> <559F25F8.1030508@sneakertech.com> <559F2853.5000103@sneakertech.com> <20150710040949.42c73f4d.freebsd@edvax.de> <559F2C78.6090102@sneakertech.com> <20150710043231.8c7cb899.freebsd@edvax.de> <559F3490.2050508@sneakertech.com> <20150710210850.a5194abe.freebsd@edvax.de> <55A03E72.3010703@sneakertech.com> <20150711005455.07157509.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150711005455.07157509.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:44:01 -0000 >> I'm still confused here. >> >> I was under the impression that if I ever wanted to be able to update >> the system via patches, I had to leave the 'src' option selected during >> install. Are you saying that is or is not true? > > It's important that you have /usr/src; _how_ you get it is > not important. During installation, src.txz will be uncompressed, > that's _one_ way to do it. SVN checkout is another. And you > can also use freebsd-update to obtain the "src" component. > You only need the source tree if you're going to apply patches > to the source and then recompile the system; the binary update > method does not require it - but it _can_ be used to keep your > local source tree current. .....So...... cycling back to what I was complaining about yesterday, I know you can individually patch things with the make/install dance but that requires installing a bunch of extra crap, which is annoying on semi-embedded systems. I'm still confused as to how we got off on this tangent since you don't actually seem to be disagreeing with me, but whatever. In any event, I take it that there's no way to do anything with freebsd-update besides press its single idiot button, so we'll just have to continue doing the dance like we've been.