From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 2 12:43:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6464337BB17 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 12:43:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [194.78.233.215] (dialup746.brussels2.skynet.be [195.238.25.234]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8B9D9AB; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:42:57 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200004021934.MAA55371@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <200004021934.MAA55371@cwsys.cwsent.com> Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:42:44 +0200 To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , Tobias Roth From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: sendmail 8.10.0 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:34 PM -0700 2000/4/2, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > I believe that Sendmail 8.10.0 is slightly broken. In tests, unless I > did something wrong, SuperSafe does not create queue files in mqueue, > instead queueing in memory. So, in the case of a system crash mail > would be lost. Sendmail wouldn't be doing this if it weren't safe. Have you done a detailed analysis of the situation and the code? -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message