From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 3 11:54: 8 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CE037C5AE; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:53:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA07960; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:53:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Nick Hibma Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys bus.h bus_private.h src/sys/kern subr_bus.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2000 19:36:42 BST." Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 20:53:51 +0200 Message-ID: <7958.962650431@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Nick Hibma wri tes: > >I take offence to this message. The arrogance displayed in the last >paragraph is astonishing. > >Second, I require that the manpage for device_set_softc contains a >sentence that indicates that the softc needs only be set in cases where >the softc provided by newbus does not give the driver the required >flexiblity (*). You're wasting your breath. You can require all you want, you can take all the offence you want: "it ain't gonna make no difference". FreeBSD delivers tools, not policy. This includes the policy on softc use in device drivers you seem to advocate. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message