From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 26 23:55:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4406716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C9543D49 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:55:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from h@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from bsdharry (firewall.zenk.de [212.14.84.243]) i3R6tRb7026857 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:55:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from h@schmalzbauer.de) From: Harald Schmalzbauer Organization: Zenk Gesellschaft =?iso-8859-15?q?f=FCr_Systemberatung?= m.b.H. To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:55:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 X-Name: Zenk Gesellschaft fuer Systemberatung m.b.H. X-Address: Schaeufeleinstrasse 1 X-Location: 80686 Muenchen X-Country: Germany X-Phone: +49 (0) 89 5468490 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_NPgjAuwfnUVqzFQ"; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404270855.09646.h@schmalzbauer.de> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mailjail.dmz.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 04:50:35 -0700 Subject: More than 8 labels per slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: antwort@schmalzbauer.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 06:55:34 -0000 --Boundary-02=_NPgjAuwfnUVqzFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dear coders, is there any chance that FreeBSD can adopt the OpenBSD changes reagrding UF= S=20 labels? I'm using one label per jail and this old 8 label limit forces me t= o=20 use different slices which sometimes, when I have to change label sizes, is= a=20 big handicap. Having 16 labels would improove the jail-handling greatly IMHO. Having 32=20 labels (like I think NetBSD) was even greater, but lifting the 8 label limi= t=20 would suffice I think. Thank you in advance, =2DHarry --Boundary-02=_NPgjAuwfnUVqzFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAjgPNBylq0S4AzzwRAnN2AJ0S4oAqSHHHKqyZBWPnv42ahwOTaQCeOglM +Nw0Suf0S6ocMVLwbGe2NmI= =iBKW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_NPgjAuwfnUVqzFQ--