From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 11 00:11:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4814816A4CE for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:11:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C946343D1D for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:11:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcapote@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so220694wra for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:11:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=JJkHuD/T2eZGCD/SMXEBpNatZqfV9FmpA2t6TChQz8xYMF/HhsOU7JOf7MP0dJB2k7O+G5WyfSaQ+FaWyHvH0GWRflemqnS/p7h9s+zcqK0ISD2UASNLj2bGZ2Yzxj5AycO8cza8u1k6Y/4VM1Hr6uC+iBbilmJd8wY+9hce2hs= Received: by 10.54.33.79 with SMTP id g79mr38920wrg; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:11:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([65.10.15.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id d7sm11327wra.2005.02.10.16.11.51; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:11:51 -0800 (PST) From: Julio Capote To: Shawn Harrison In-Reply-To: <420BF1FF.9030400@tbc.net> References: <20050210182549.15605.qmail@web53601.mail.yahoo.com> <420BF1FF.9030400@tbc.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:14:26 -0500 Message-Id: <1108080866.658.20.camel@hatter.wonderland.dn> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:11:58 -0000 I think that the entire point of an IT deptartment, is to provide that "geek abstraction"; no CEO goes to www.linux.com and decides to go with linux for thier infastructure. They ask thier IT deptartment to make those decisions. On the same token, no small business owner/executive is going to goto www.freebsd.com and download an iso and install it on all thier servers based on some marketing hype. Sites like www.redhat.com are an exception because they are indeed a commercial entity that sells services/products based on Linux, Freebsd has no such entity. On the other hand, I am all for a redesigning of the .org website so that looks a bit more professional (something like www.mozilla.org maybe?), complete with OUR OWN forums, instead of using bsdforums.org. A wiki would also be nice. Just my 2 cents.. - Julio On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:45 -0600, Shawn Harrison wrote: > Joshua Tinnin wrote [02/10/05 5:19 PM]: > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 10:25 am, "Scott I. Remick" > > wrote: > > > > > >>Anyhow, on a side note: I still think the www.freebsd.COM site is an > >>excellent idea. Hopefully some people with the time and skills can > >>pull it off. That is not me, but they get my vote and gratitude. > > > > > > Maybe I missed this ... what would be the purpose of freebsd.com? PR? > > Just curious ... maybe I could help out here. > > > > - jt > > An interface to FreeBSD that says, "Professional solutions for > enterprise IT management and infrastructure" rather than "Cool > open-source software project." You know, links like "Products, > Solutions, Partners" rather than "Bugs, Download, Community." > > A counter example might be "Linux.com". Big headline today: "GNOME Photo > Printer: A nifty little app" To me, it screams, "Geek site." I think the > point is to create something that people who don't necessarily like > nifty apps and neat features would be persuaded by. > > That's just my take on it. Hope I'm not stepping on any toes -- I think > FreeBSD.com is a great idea.