From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Nov 27 19:48:32 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA28653
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 19:48:32 -0800
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA28648
          for <FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 19:48:24 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA25824; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 19:48:20 -0800
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 19:48:20 -0800
Message-Id: <199511280348.TAA25824@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu
CC: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951127201040.19337A-100000@latte.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Mon, 27 Nov 1995 20:11:57 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: misc/colorls
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * I notice that colorls DEPENDS on ncftp2.2.  Is this really necessary?  It 
 * seems a little overkill ...

Well, it FETCH_DEPENDS on ncftp, which means it is used for fetching
only (i.e., not if you are using the package).  And yes it is
necessary, the stock ncftp can't handle the "pack up on-the-fly"
option of wu-ftpd.... :<

Satoshi