From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 01:38:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D1B106566C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from newsbox@mjws.net) Received: from mail2.mjws.net (mail2.mjws.net [68.183.109.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38A18FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.mjws.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.mjws.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847FEE83F; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:20:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mjws.net Received: from mail2.mjws.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mail2.mjws.net (mail2.mjws.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qP5Ppw+xFlep; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from secure.mjws.net (www.mjws.net [68.183.109.239]) by mail2.mjws.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3669CE83D; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68.183.109.181 (SquirrelMail authenticated user newsbox@mjws.net) by secure.mjws.net with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:20:03 -0700 Message-ID: <9a6e2271cc3970126017f13be03fd12f.squirrel@secure.mjws.net> In-Reply-To: <20110529222909.GA11577@SDF.ORG> References: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> <20110529143237.GA16057@SDF.ORG> <20110529222909.GA11577@SDF.ORG> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:20:03 -0700 From: newsbox@mjws.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Joe Altman Subject: Re: Building misc/freebsd-doc-en fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:38:18 -0000 > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 02:32:37PM +0000, Joe Altman wrote: >> >> There is this thread from 2009, and it looks like the same issue as >> the one in this message: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-December/209892.html >> >> It looks like I'll need to open a bug report with the Doc project >> team. > > After reading the thread referenced above, and looking at the output > of my build, I noticed that the build was failing in different areas. > > So I decided to run make on the port multiple times, and eventually > the port installed successfully. However, the port in my tree (dated # > $FreeBSD: ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/Makefile,v 1.36 2011/05/22 > 14:28:49 blackend Exp $) in a fresh tree made only through > 2010, according to the copyright at the top of the > handbook. Individual files in that doc tree were variously dated; the > newest being 8/2010. > > So I ran make, multiple times, on the source; and that gave me a doc > tree dated 2011. Most of the files there were dated 5/29/11. A few > exceptions were found in image files dated 3/2010, which all loaded in > SeaMonkey, except for some files in: advanced-networking, security, > vinum, geom. I may have missed others in other books. > > To summarize: > > 1) It appears that make is, in this case, a hammer that must be > applied more than once to either the source or the port. > > 2) Not all images are seen as valid, and according to make may have > bad magic numbers. If building from source is used on a fresh tree, it > may be possible to have make ignore all the errors by using the -k > flag. > > 3) I have no idea how things will go with an upgrade to the doc > source; I normally use portupgrade, so I suppose I will find out > later. > > I've submitted a bug report. > > Best regards, > > Joe > > > > > Hi, This might not be the same as an issue I had because I'm not really sure how the docs are built. I did not have doc in my cvs supfile at first. I have the following in my cvs supfile: src-all ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. And my issue went away if I remember correctly. Regards, Mike