Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:10:19 +0100
From:      "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de>
To:        Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com>
Cc:        amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tyan alternatives cuz their support totally sucks
Message-ID:  <439055CB.2030403@mail.uni-mainz.de>
In-Reply-To: <4390488A.9060708@wmptl.com>
References:  <20051201172828.5b25fdd4.kgunders@teamcool.net> <4390488A.9060708@wmptl.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Requirements:
>>
>> 1) Single Opteron should suffice
>> 2) DDR400 ECC supported
>> 3) SATA disk subsystem will suffice 2 drive gmirror conf.  4 drive
>> would be bonus.  SATA-II (or 3.0 I guess they're calling it now)
>> preferred.

As far as I know, SATA-II is NOT SATA 3.0. SATA-II is still SATA 1.0a 
and defines doubling of tranfer rate.

>>
>> All this b.s. w/Tyan has chewed up far too much of my time so I need
>> something that will "just work" and not require any hardware
>> compatibility histrionics.
> 
> I've always had good experiences with MSI boards/systems... generally 
> well priced/featured and their support is pretty good.
>

TYAN is said to be a good choice in building server related systems, 
while MSI is more aimed for the home and office market (I may be wrong).

Oliver





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?439055CB.2030403>