From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 18 08:11:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9AA3D16A4CE; Tue, 18 May 2004 08:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ip166.usw253.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com
	[209.20.253.166])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D45E543D41; Tue, 18 May 2004 08:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1BQ6F9-000GkZ-Ga; Tue, 18 May 2004 08:10:59 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16554.10114.704299.907232@ran.psg.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:10:58 -0700
To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
References: <20040518063753.GB2038@over-yonder.net>
	<200405180804.i4I8477E019740@gw.catspoiler.org>
	<16554.7288.281205.464222@ran.psg.com>
	<20040518143027.GE2038@over-yonder.net>
cc: 4711@chello.at
cc: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
Subject: Re: bind timeouts
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:11:02 -0000

>> no.  it means an MX referring to a CNAME which resolves to an A
> Not by my reading.

then maybe try reading rfc 2181 sec 10.3

randy