Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:11:36 +0700 From: budsan02@bdg.centrin.net.id To: freebsd-questions@FREEBSD.ORG Subject: Re: conflict: orinoco card vs 3com in my 4.4-stable box? Message-ID: <200201280711.g0S7BaR29169@jupiter.centrin.net.id>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: <budsan02@bdg.centrin.net.id> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FREEBSD.ORG> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:30 PM Subject: Re: conflict: orinoco card vs 3com in my 4.4-stable box? > You're starting in the wrong place. First you need to know whether > the card is even being recognized. What does wicontrol tell you? > > Greg > -- It is recognised: it prints out message to stdout during booting: -Lucent TechnologiesWaveLAN/IEEE card fount at irq 5 slot 0 at address <hex addr, sorry i can't remember..> -Lucent WaveLAN/IEEE inserted. -pccard started. But theres another error msg printed out to stdout: Can't find 202.143.99.200: network is unreachable If i test the same card, along together with 3com eth card in my windows box it runs completely ok and can ping/connect everywhere. Unfortunately configuration in window 2000 is completely automatic/ i can't find out what's the setting in window except some irq's and gateway ip that's left BLANK in 3com eth win2000 TCP/IP setting. What's seems to be the core of the problem? False route between the cards or false wicontrol setting? If so the problem is false route, how can I route my 3com ethernet to itself/ without pointing it to ISP gateway also, so it won't collide with my orinoco's wi0 setting? Need help asap, thanks, budsz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201280711.g0S7BaR29169>