From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 10:09:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D3416A4E7; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CBC43E27; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.131]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id k7MA5SkJ074079; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:05:38 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GFT7H-0000J1-0d; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:04:15 +0400 To: Peter Jeremy References: <20060820110545.GG1066@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <94951745@bsam.ru> <20060822090859.GO96644@cell.sick.ru> <20060822093823.GB743@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:04:15 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20060822093823.GB743@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> (Peter Jeremy's message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:38:23 +1000") Message-ID: <69974160@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: Powerd makes computer hang X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:09:33 -0000 On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:38:23 +1000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, 2006-Aug-22 13:08:59 +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:57:02PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >B> Glebius@ (CCed) sent me a patch against 6-STABLE which solves the > >B> problem. However, I don't know if the patch was committed. > > > >If that was a patch that was required for merging the em(4) changes, > >then the answer is "yes". It was merged to STABLE. > In that case, my problem is different. I have bge(4), not em(4). You shouldn't delete the quoting. ;-) So, those patches (needed to _merge_ the em(4) changes) are really for the acpi subsystem. I had a freezing notebook after updating to 6.1-RELEASE and found out that the recent acpi changes are to blame. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve