From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 13 09:43:02 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAB716A428
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilfre@mail.ru)
Received: from mx6.mail.ru (mx6.mail.ru [194.67.23.26])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9B043D53
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:43:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wilfre@mail.ru)
Received: from [213.59.98.218] (port=30987 helo=[192.168.111.6])
	by mx6.mail.ru with asmtp id 1FIjZn-000CUS-00
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:42:55 +0300
Message-ID: <44153E9C.3050307@mail.ru>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:42:52 +0300
From: "Andrey V. Semyonov" <wilfre@mail.ru>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060309)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Put non-ether iface + ether-iface into bridge mode
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:43:02 -0000

Hi,

Is it possible to make a non-ether iface work bridged together ether-iface?
As for example:

[NET1] <-> {if1_1}[ROUTER1]{if1_0} <-> wireless <-> 
{if0_0}[ROUTER0]{if0_1} <-> [NET0]
                                                       {ppp1} 
<------------------> {ppp0}

As for insufficient security provided by wireless protocols I try to 
establish {ppp1}-{ppp0} encrypted link on top of wireless link 
{if1_0}-{if0_0}. But the figure is there are not only IP packets in the 
wire, also it must transport IPX packets, so I decided to transport all 
of ethernet traffic between routers through ppp-link and setting 
{if1_1}+{ppp1}=bridge1 and {ppp0}+{if0_1}=bridge0. But neither 
ng_bridge, nor if_bridge allow to set bridged non-ether type iface.