Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 12:38:10 +0300 From: Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi> To: "'Wayne Baety'" <mrfoine@enteract.com> Cc: "'Brian Somers'" <brian@awfulhak.org>, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu>, "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: /var/run/natd.pid request Message-ID: <01BC772D.7D5DBC60@ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 12. kesakuuta 1997 11:41, Wayne Baety [SMTP:mrfoine@enteract.com] wrote: > > > Well this is what i did a while back and needed the PID of natd....I think > it requires procfs for the grepping of /proc thou.... I Just attached all > of my cfg files for pppd..etc. Not sure if this was the best > solution....but it worked for me. Also there is a script to return the > pidof of a process by name....for the first match it prints just the PID > but any other matches aren't parsed and status information is printed in > the whole.....was a nice little script to get the PID of a named process > quickly w/o using ps.....since at the time ps was crashing my -current. > > I browsed through your scripts: The reason why neither SIGHUP or -dynamic would work for you is that you use -alias_address option. Dynamic features work only if you give the name of interface (with -interface) option instead of using -alias_address. Ari S.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01BC772D.7D5DBC60>