Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:48:45 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Matias Surdi <matiassurdi@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Large raid arrays
Message-ID:  <20090120164747.J18283@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4975B64F.20207@gmail.com>
References:  <gl4auv$pdd$1@ger.gmane.org> <gl4bce$pdd$2@ger.gmane.org> <4975B4E5.7000609@isafeelin.org> <4975B64F.20207@gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>> 
>
>
> ZFS was a disaster.
>
> That is what we were using until today, when the power went off  and the zfs 
> pool ended up corrupted and irrecoverable.

normal.

>
> Three other times we had power failures, the zpool ended with some errors.
>
> But, all the times, the UFS partitions remained intact.

indeed. and fsck time can be fast if you correctly set up block size and 
amount of inodes. i mean not too much inodes and large blocks (32-64K) if 
you store mostly big files.

> I won't use ZFS for a long time.
i would recommend never.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090120164747.J18283>