Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 20:58:39 -0600 (MDT) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: luoqi@watermarkgroup.com (Luoqi Chen) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, imp@village.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/aic aic.c Message-ID: <199910280258.UAA13232@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <199910271540.LAA04366@lor.watermarkgroup.com> from Luoqi Chen at "Oct 27, 1999 11:40:15 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luoqi Chen wrote... > > >> In message <199910262211.PAA94274@freefall.freebsd.org> Luoqi Chen writes: > > >> : Enable tagged queueing (should it be spelled as queuing?) by default. > > >> > > > > > http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/elt/dictionary/cmd_search.asp?key=queue*1+0&dict=b > > > > > They spell it 'queueing'. I suppose it can be spelled either way. > > > > The relevant question in this case is, how does the SCSI standard > > spell it? > > > Good point! It is 'queuing' in the X3T9.2/375 draft I have :-) We should probably just leave it as "you can spell it either way", otherwise I'm sure someone will feel an uncontrollable urge to change all occurrences of one spelling to the other in the tree. (Thus the reason I even bothered to point out you can spell it two different ways.) Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910280258.UAA13232>