From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 23 14:39:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70CAAC8; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.64.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B4E8FC0C; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9NEdi9P086121; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:39:44 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9NEdiSU086120; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:39:44 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:39:44 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: svn commit: r241889 - in user/andre/tcp_workqueue/sys: arm/arm cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs ddb dev/acpica dev/... Message-ID: <20121023143944.GW70741@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210221418.q9MEINkr026751@svn.freebsd.org> <20121023032743.K2804@besplex.bde.org> <508664C7.3080206@freebsd.org> <201210230853.56549.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201210230853.56549.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Andre Oppermann , Bruce Evans , svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:39:46 -0000 On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 08:53:56AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: J> It's not super clear to me that having one macro to replace J> 'struct mtx and MTX_SYSINIT' is substantially more readable compared to just J> adding '__aligned(CACHE_LINE_SIZE)' at the end of global locks. +1 for this -- Totus tuus, Glebius.