Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:15:24 +1300 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@freebsddiary.org> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: webalizer fails to install on one box Message-ID: <200002212115.KAA73506@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000221161308.A92177@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200002212108.KAA73349@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>; from dan@freebsddiary.org on Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 10:08:40AM %2B1300
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 Feb 00, at 16:13, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 10:08:40AM +1300, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > webalizer depends on X without actually requiring it in the Makefile. > > > > How about explaining that in small words to use lessor mortals? > > webalizer has a dependency to graphics/xpm but doesn't state that in the > *_DEPENDS section. It may have dependended on gd's dependency of Xpm in > the past, which has changed recently. OK. So why does it install on one box, but not another? -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited [I'm looking for more work] The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.freebsddiary.org/ NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/ The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/ unix @ home - http://www.unixathome.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002212115.KAA73506>