From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 27 08:40:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09926B49738 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 582251083 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 89479 invoked from network); 27 May 2016 08:40:32 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 27 May 2016 08:40:32 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20160527.104032.41706561.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: stdin@niklaas.eu Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD,Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> References: <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:40:35 -0000 > > I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: > [...] > > 96 bit works too: > [...] > > FreeBSD version? Mine is 10.3-RELEASE-p3. lab1 is 10.3-PRERELEASE r297313M lab2 is 10.2-STABLE r288601M Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no