From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 10 20:08:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA527106568F for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B60F8FC13 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16842 invoked by uid 399); 10 Dec 2009 20:08:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 10 Dec 2009 20:08:38 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B215549.5030403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:08:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alberto Villa References: <4B159C5C.2090407@FreeBSD.org> <200912100153.02634.villa.alberto@gmail.com> <200912100202.37515.villa.alberto@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200912100202.37515.villa.alberto@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster-with-package-support release candidate available for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:40 -0000 Alberto Villa wrote: > On Thursday 10 December 2009 01:53:01 Alberto Villa wrote: >>> --delete-build-only >>> For packages/ports that are ONLY listed as build dependencies for the >>> ports being updated in this run, delete them when the run is over. >> it's still building, then i don't know if the second case above (gmake's >> case) will work correctly > > no, it doesn't... gmake was deleted > at least, i think that this is not correct :P You are correct that it is not correct. This was a combination of choices that had not occurred to me, which is why I highly value people who test my code. :) The fix for this is in the svn tree now, please give it a try. I have fixed a few bugs since 2.13 was committed, so I'll be pushing the svn code into cvs very soon. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/