From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 15 11:56:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B5B15503 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:56:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: (from will@localhost) by blackdawn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA00483; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:56:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from will) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19991216033056A.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:56:17 -0500 (EST) From: will andrews To: "R. Imura" Subject: Re: ports/15434: new port: devel/kdevelop Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, ade@lovett.com Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 15-Dec-99 R. Imura wrote: >> > o The port depends on many other ports. Year, if they are installed, >> > kdevelop will be more power-full and we will be happy, but they are >> > not really **nessesary**. > > It would be. But I meant the following optional RUN_DEPENDS. :) > > RUN_DEPENDS= autoconf:${PORTSDIR}/devel/autoconf \ You're both wrong. _THIS_ must be installed for kdevelop to serve any useful purpose at all. Although the rest _are_ optional. ;-) I am still waiting to hear (valid) reasons why the kdelibs11/qt142 ports have not been upgraded. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message