Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:58:26 -0700 From: Nick Sivo <nick@ycombinator.com> To: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS Deadlock? Message-ID: <CAM72HBZ50c3hYhMoFQnndSMaVdtB99CeCnWUR1K0auQgjXaS7A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAM72HBYMTftWj6svLYPd%2Bf-6=yTTHNp4H6rqWqy1NSXGGArW9A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAM72HBb0C-DQszMZFH706rP4hJK_V9dJdVzmtSJqqafue2ud9Q@mail.gmail.com> <54FAD0B2.8060601@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAD47B.7090007@sorbs.net> <54FADEBF.2060905@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAE018.8080509@sorbs.net> <54FAE513.3030107@multiplay.co.uk> <CAM72HBYMTftWj6svLYPd%2Bf-6=yTTHNp4H6rqWqy1NSXGGArW9A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We've got Racket running on 10.1 and are planning to switch over tonight. I'll come back with new stack traces and logs if we encounter similar problems. Thanks! -Nick On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Nick Sivo <nick@ycombinator.com> wrote: > Unfortunately in our case we can't easily upgrade to 10 or 10.1 > because Racket (6.1.1) on them isn't stable and core dumps. Fixing > Racket trunk on FreeBSD 10+ was not the next step I expected, > especially since 9.3 is still considered "supported" for nearly two > more years. > > Not what I wanted to hear, but good to know regardless. Thanks! > > -Nick > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >> On 07/03/2015 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>> >>> Steven Hartland wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/03/2015 10:35, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Steven Hartland wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> There are lots of fixes for ZFS issues in 10 so I'd recommend updated >>>>>> to 10.1-RELEASE to see if you issue is already resolved there. >>>>>> >>>>> Question is will the fixes be applied to 9.4? Will there be a 9.4? >>>>> >>>> Unlikely I now any changes I've been doing I've only been MFC'ing to >>>> 10 not 9 or 8. >>> >>> I wouldn't expect 8 being that it's already at 8.4 therefore no more >>> releases just patches... but are we not getting a 9.4? Should not the >>> known issues that have been addresses have their fixes integrated? >>> >> I couldn't comment on if there will be a 9.4, even if there is I wouldn't >> expect all the fixes that are in 10 to be present if I'm honest, the team >> only has so much time so prioritising the latest releases is just something >> that's going to have to happen. >> >> We're already had 10 and now 10.1 I'd say its time to upgrade ;-) >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAM72HBZ50c3hYhMoFQnndSMaVdtB99CeCnWUR1K0auQgjXaS7A>