From owner-freebsd-doc  Sat May 11  2:50: 8 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237BE37B406
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 11 May 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4B9o4l33371;
	Sat, 11 May 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200205110950.g4B9o4l33371@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge
Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-doc.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-doc>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-doc>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR docs/37943; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
To: Martin Heinen <martin@sumuk.de>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 12:27:02 +0300

 The majority of the changes look fine.  Where I am commenting below,
 there are a few fine points I was thinking about.
 
 On 2002-05-11 00:46, Martin Heinen wrote:
 > -      <para>The most recent example of this is when the <quote/ppp/ group
 > -	(later renamed <quote/network/) was added.  Users had the
 > +      <para>The most recent example of this is when the <groupname>ppp</groupname> group
 > +	(later renamed <groupname>network</groupname>) was added.  Users had the
 
 This is also touched by patches of another PR I was reading.  One
 submitted by Greg Shapiro.  If someone commits this one or the diff I
 sent in the audit trail of that PR a little merging work will be
 necessary for this part ;)
 
 > -          Pentium 3 with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
 > +          Pentium III with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build
 
 Is this really necessary?  I'm not saying it's wrong or something.
 But is III the way these processors should be referred to in written
 text?
 
 Giorgos Keramidas                       FreeBSD Documentation Project
 keramida@{freebsd.org,ceid.upatras.gr}  http://www.FreeBSD.org/docproj/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message