Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:26:54 -0700 From: Milo Hyson <milo@cyberlifelabs.com> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Curious about SCM choice Message-ID: <1E7FB809-CFBE-4ED6-9F32-97C90359BBF9@cyberlifelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com> References: <E2C84A13-15E7-4BFE-B44F-A4C27966188C@cyberlifelabs.com> <4e571dd70806271037j59faed19y8d3e29423c9d8a2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:37, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Do you want a centralized or distributed model for your development > model? CVS, SVN, and Perforce are all centralized repositories > (Perforce even moreso that the others). Hg, git, and bzr are all > decentralized and distributed models. ... > Moving to SVN makes a lot of sense for the FreeBSD project ... works > well with our existing development model (one central repository > that everyone talks to). Can not the "decentralized" systems like Mercurial and GIT be used in a centralized fashion? Our internal experiments certainly show them to be every bit as capable as Subversion in this regard. Has your experience been different? -- Milo Hyson Chief Scientist CyberLife Labs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1E7FB809-CFBE-4ED6-9F32-97C90359BBF9>