From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 11 22:23:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA11840 for current-outgoing; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:23:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA11818 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:23:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0y2s3e-0003fY-00; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:23:38 -0800 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:23:35 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: Terry Lambert cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH.C: NFS client and server locking kernel patches In-Reply-To: <199802120550.WAA02802@usr02.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > Here is my second try at this (majordomo stomped the first). I have > gzipped and uuencoded these to save space. It seems very wasteful sending patches out to a mailing list, considering the number of the people on the list, and the size of intended audience. A http or ftp site would be much better. > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe current" in the body of the message