Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 22:32:15 +0100 From: Aurelien Nephtali <aurelien.nephtali@wanadoo.fr> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspend/resume improved? Message-ID: <41B772DF.4010005@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <41B76BB6.3090902@root.org> References: <41B4E577.9060502@root.org> <41B50754.10604@centtech.com> <41B50C12.6070103@root.org> <41B554B1.7070508@wanadoo.fr> <41B5CFDB.4090203@root.org> <5334c8b04120800112e8a398a@mail.gmail.com> <41B76BB6.3090902@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Lawson wrote: > Try X also. For some video cards, it has a better chance of > reinitializing things than the console. Is the system live? Does > capslock work? Does the hdd light flash when you hit the button to wake > the system? Can you ping it from another host or see output from a > serial console of it attempting to resume? > > Did you add Warner/Takanori's beep patch and hear it beep while starting > to resume? This test is the most important to see if the wake code is > even getting called or your system doesn't even start resuming. > It does the same thing under X. The laptop can't be ping'ed when resumed, the system does not seem to be alive and the HDD ligh does not light at all. I would like to test the beep patch but I can't find it anywhere ... :/ -- NEPHTALI 'dak' Aurelien TEK2 - Promo 2008 06.19.84.90.10
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41B772DF.4010005>