Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:20:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217138] head (e.g.) -r314638 for arm64: sh vs. jemalloc asserts: include/jemalloc/internal/tsd.h:687: Failed assertion: "tsd_booted" once swapped in after being swapped out (comment 10) Message-ID: <bug-217138-6-KgiNyL8MaR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-217138-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-217138-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217138 --- Comment #24 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #22) Being explicit about the combined conditions for failure for my test program: Both tcache enabled and allocations fitting in SMALL_MAXCLASS are required in order to make the program fail. Note: lldb) print __je_tcache_maxclass (size_t) $0 =3D 32768 which is larger than SMALL_MAXCLASS. I've not observed failures for sizes above SMALL_MAXCLASS but not exceeding __je_tcache_maxclass. Thus tcache use by itself does not seen sufficient for my program to get corruption of its dynamically allocated memory: the small allocation size also matters. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217138-6-KgiNyL8MaR>