Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Jul 2016 14:32:28 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 211333] Inconsistent exposure of unlinkat and AT_REMOVEDIR
Message-ID:  <bug-211333-8-8nATa4ZSiH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-211333-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-211333-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211333

Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |Closed
                 CC|                            |jilles@FreeBSD.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
           Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org    |jilles@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> ---
Applications are not supposed to define __BSD_VISIBLE and whenever
<sys/cdefs.h> sets __BSD_VISIBLE to non-zero, it also sets __POSIX_VISIBLE =
and
__XSI_VISIBLE to the newest version supported. Therefore, the correct fix i=
s to
remove the || __BSD_VISIBLE part in that line in include/unistd.h. I did th=
is
in 11-current in SVN r265878 but do not plan to MFC it.

Note that it is still possible to have __POSIX_VISIBLE or __XSI_VISIBLE in =
the
same #if as __BSD_VISIBLE if the feature was deprecated by POSIX and is
therefore only available in older POSIX versions but should still be availa=
ble
in the default compilation environment.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211333-8-8nATa4ZSiH>