Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:14:34 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= <trond.endrestol@ximalas.info> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby 2.4.7,1 considered vulnerable? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.1908311013180.5686@enterprise.ximalas.info> In-Reply-To: <531cf12d-0038-ec72-f173-033d7b2d44ba@gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.1908310904001.5686@enterprise.ximalas.info> <531cf12d-0038-ec72-f173-033d7b2d44ba@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:43+1000, MJ wrote: > Given the liberal use of portepoch in the package versions I expect > the maintainer has got confused. Indeed perhaps it's the portepoch > that's causing the issue. Perhaps contact the maintainer to get it > worked through? I just created PR 240227: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240227 -- Trond.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.1908311013180.5686>