From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 12 00:21:17 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2F72D6;
 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:21:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from cochard@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.212.178])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAE58FC0A;
 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:21:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hr7so66653wib.13
 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=xNSXdimHMHnWI3MnvOQbd5VbjZoq1TiPM0ch33Ce/oc=;
 b=g4ztNlZgvaO2vzP+LPZW3nBDF7djPnzDcNg7o+Cqq2EHtcx5N7d1zfMBSGvmJST57p
 RSCqDar07T1S3E7X7twSZyc0iQhJolPcimGicmm6QsN42hWbH+vCGYWRaHVYTqfOl0s/
 81AgUBxPvb3UM6rD03lUSz6hbxM8x721ea7waywxXb1G/k6tVK9gzVok8b/rs7qgexlq
 R0fTVmkHtLCnol5Cr2k7vmcN0w72T9K8Jd0pCcyH6k35G9VUP2A3ztttzAIGnAwuX163
 tke0rauyDdm/YnVFq0qfgSpd4QyiDDQbCQAm0lt8b10vZ/02PX8jYK7rYt8IpVaEEUn1
 Olzg==
Received: by 10.216.204.72 with SMTP id g50mr1494426weo.142.1350001275779;
 Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cochard@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.157.200 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20121010233404.GI34622@glebius.int.ru>
References: <20121009154128.GU34622@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121010195842.GH34622@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121010222651.GR40452@mdounin.ru> <20121010233404.GI34622@glebius.int.ru>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 02:20:55 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xjxftw9t-oGe6GEl4jihr84V5pg
Message-ID: <CA+q+TcrC5DCg00UfR8TT9qc38mc6LEEs6Mf=E42VkwQ1fbLMiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CFT/Review] net byte order for AF_INET
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: net@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:21:17 -0000

I've done some tests with this net byte ordered(NBO) patch:
- I've compiled 2 i386 images of BSD Router Project (current branch
rev241418): One with the patch, and the other without the patch [1]
- I've run my "full-features testing lab" under VirtualBox [2] using
theses images.

Here are the differences:
- I can't SSH to and between the NBO-patched-FreeBSD;
- Lot's of messages "in_cksum_skip: out of data by 28560/23460" on the
non-patched FreeBSD (R2 and R3 on the diagram in [2])
- PPTP tunnel (net/mpd5) didn't works on the NBO-patched-FreeBSD;

Regards,

Olivier

[1] http://gugus69.free.fr/freebsd/netbyteorder/
[2] http://bsdrp.net/documentation/examples/maximum_bsdrp_features_lab