From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jun 20 01:23:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA25915
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 01:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA25910;
          Thu, 20 Jun 1996 01:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA10415; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 01:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>
cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>,
        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:00:23 +0200."
             <199606192200.AAA00502@campa.panke.de> 
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 01:21:15 -0700
Message-ID: <10413.835258875@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> we have bsd.obj.mk, obtained from NetBSD (with bugfixes of course). 
> bsd.obj.mk know what bmake do with the obj directory.
> Unfortunately I had not the time to integrate bsd.obj.mk into
> bsd.prog.mk.
> 
> Do you want break compatibility with NetBSD?

In the .mk file sense?  It wouldn't bother me too much if it advanced
the cause of src/obj separation in shared source trees.

					Jordan